Recent Must-See Vids on the Covid/Vax Disaster
Kirsch, McCullough, Rose, and Carlson & Weinstein
With respect to the most-momentous story of our time, the Covid/Vax Disaster, there is constantly news. It is news suppressed on all the “official” channels, Fox included, but nonetheless, it is a firehose flow concerning 40-50 rapidly developing stories/debates, and with newer ones added every month.
Hitherto my substack writings on the Disaster have been more conceptual or big-picture, straining to understand how we should speak about its main items and think about its longer-term implications. My writings have also had a special focus on the kinds of suppression of the story cooperated in by “respectable conservatives.”
Those foci mean that I do not make my readers aware of even 10% of what I am continually learning from my fellow dissidents. Thus, one of my resolutions for 2024 is to share more of the bigger or more shocking items.1
Here is an initial installment, linking to some key videos from the last few months; in a follow-up post, I’ll do the same with written pieces.
There is quite a bit here. To digest this post, you’re going need to five hours to take in these four videos—the raw run-time of all together would be three and half hours, but you also need time to adequately think about them, and to follow-up on a couple of their points.
Note that any boldface items are terms defined in “My Covid/Vax Disaster Lexicon,” and that every time I refer to footnotes, these are the footnotes in a key late-June piece of mine, which aside from its main most-conservatives-are-aiding-the-suppression-and-here’s-an-example point, provided an extensive sketch of the state of dissident evidence as it existed at the time.
Tucker Carlson Interview of Bret Weinstein
Full video on Rumble, here.
Someone, I think Jessica Rose, said this was the most important video of our time, likely because it will get a lot of traction, which it is has. It is important, particularly because it is a decisive move of Carlson’s, in which he (finally!) follows up on his could-have-been-barrier-breaking reporting on the vax-harm claims back in the summer of ’22. I suppose his long periods of subsequent silence about the claims are evidence of a strategy (we now-know a failed one) to hold onto his gig at Fox News, the veritable headquarters of the supservatives.
However, I judge this video as not as significant in a news-breaking or news-dramatizing way as the other three below. There is little new here for those who have been following the story. That said, I have great esteem for both Carlson and Weinstein, and their experience with the podcast format makes this the most-watchable of these four videos.
Weinstein sounds the alarm about the proposed changes to the WHO treaty and adds some significant and not-widely known details, and, he offers a theory about the Biopharmaceutical Complex’s investment in the mRNA platform that is new in several respects, and which if it pans out, will explain much.
Steve Kirsch Interview of Fired Kaiser Nurse Gail Macrae
Available on Rumble, or there is a link on Kirsch’s post about it, where he itemizes and discusses the main take-aways.
There are already scores upon scores of compelling testimony videos from nurses, just scroll around on Transcriber B’s substack to find a handful, or, purchase the new book by Ken Tucker, What the Nurses Saw, but there is something about Macrae which makes hers the most stunning one yet. Of the around 20 bullet-pointed take-aways which Kirsch writes out, most of them are anecdotal confirmations of points that dissidents have heard over and over. But there’s something about the whole package, about Macrae’s sobriety and detail, and about the way her testimony fits into previous lines of research, that makes it essential viewing. Anyone still in the weeds of willful ignorance who watches it in full will have their cozy view of our world destroyed.
The points I want to highlight are these:
1) She talked to a hospital administrator who was tracking hospital admissions in 2021, and he confirmed what she was witnessing: overall admissions had gone way up, ever since the release of the CV-19 vaxxes, specifically, 3x up. As Macrae was one of 1200 Kaiser Permanente medical personnel, mostly nurses, fired due to the vax-mandates in the fall of ’21, her own witness obviously only covers the March-April, and June-September periods after the roll-out when she was serving (she took May off). See 55-ish on, and take note especially her report that normally, hospitals have very low admissions in the summer, but not in ’21.
2) During that post-roll-out time “Code Blues,” once a rare occurrence, became common, sounding out three-times on any day, and usually were directing staff to rooms where the jabs were being administered. See 45:30-50:00. A Code Blue is announced on hospital intercoms, the faster to summon emergency personnel, indicating that a patient faces imminent death, and likely needs resuscitation. For a report by another nurse that the uptick of Code Blues continues to this day, though now presumably seldom occurring due to an initial giving of the shot, see this at the mighty substack of Nurse Dee.
3) Nurses and doctors were ordered by higher ups not to report to VAERS. See 43:00-46:00ish on the experience of one vax-administering nurse Macrae knew. If this fact about her hospital was repeated at others, it sheds light on the dissident discussion of the Underreporting Factor, or the URF, a discussion central to best estimates of the numbers killed and harmed by the CV-19 vaxxes (central at least until that day the record-level data, the data being diabolically withheld by the world’s “health agencies,” is finally released). See footnotes 1, 6, and 7. Also see 102:00-104:00 to understand why the URF has got to be very high. At least 10x VAERS, or maybe even what Kirsch has long argued for, 42x VAERS.
4) Macrae estimates that 95% or more of those who died from Covid-19 in the hospital were killed due to bad protocols.2 (29:00-32:00) That is, had they been administered steroids as per the previous standard of treatment for inflammation issues, or had they not been given Remdesivir, they would have survived.
95%!!!
And notice, her estimate of the would-have-survived only concerns those who wound up at the hospital. But how many of this set would have never wound up there had they been permitted Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, and/or other fairly-successful treatments of various early-treatment protocols? The correct contrafactual subtractions, at two key points then, might bring us to a percentage as high as 97%!
Let’s just run with that off-the-cuff estimate, and gape at the implications: 97% of those who contracted the virus and then died in hospital need not have. Assume that at least a fifth of the reported Covid-19 deaths were not really Covid-19 deaths, but deaths “with Covid” mainly caused by some other condition. I believe many dissidents put the number of with-Covid deaths at much higher percentage of the total reported than 20%, but I don’t know where to go for the best estimation of what the right percentage would be—tip me in the comments if you know the key dissident pieces on that. So just assume for the moment that this 20% estimate is in the ball-park. We take the official estimates of Covid deaths, which stand at around 7 million world-wide, and subtract 1.4 million, leaving 5.6 million. Then we take 97% of this, subtract out that 5,432,000, and behold, 168,000 is the number of deaths we should have suffered from the Frankenvirus—world-wide!!!
Or to put it in terms of my lexicon, around 5.4 million of the Covid deaths were protocol-suspected deaths. The world’s 21st-century hospitals and health agencies, at the protocol orders of the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, killed almost as many persons as Germany, at the murderous orders of Adolf Hitler, killed Jews.
And since this criminally negligent conformity to the Complex’s orders—orders that unprecedentedly prohibited doctors’ freedom to exercise their own judgment, and to experiment with different protocols—is only “Sin No. 1” in my list of the Seven Deadly Sins of the Covid/Vax Disaster, the shocking 5.4 million number is before we even get to the additional deaths traceable to lockdown rules, and those deaths, so far, from the CV-19 shots, which I extra-cautiously estimate at around 4-6 million, but which many dissidents more informed than I, such as Bret Weinstein above, or Peter McCullough below (11:20), are now tending to estimate at around 17 million world-wide, with 600,000 of these being U.S. deaths.
Peter McCullough with Paul Brennan on Cardiovascular Harms
Video here.
Brennan is a New Zealand radio host, and in this December 4th interview, he asks McCullough about two recent studies, or sets of studies, with alarming implications for cardiovascular area of Covid-19 vax-harms.
The first of these is a paper by Crosson and colleagues at Harvard, and “it shows that the mRNA from the vaccine is…stuck in the heart,” and that inflammation surrounds it. McCullough explains further, explaining certain limitations of the study, and adding that this result was not found in all vax recipients. He then quotes another study indicating that the result is often associated with the recipient having had a sore arm in the hours and days directly after vaccination.
Ugh—I have a few friends and relatives who belong to this class of persons who, according to this, have likely had some so-far undetected cardiac damage.
He adds to this a set of studies that approach the same issue from a more statistical approach. These suggest that many more harms and deaths in this one area of CV-19 vax-damage are coming, and I’ll just quote the transcript:
Now, two papers, Mansougan and Buren, and then a supportive paper by Levi, they show that the rate of bona fide heart damage that'll put you in the hospital per shot is 2.5%.
Now, there's a broader group of people that, you know, they don't have such a severe syndrome, but their heart is pounding, they have some chest pain, blood pressure up and down. That group is much broader. That could be even a third of people.
There's a recent paper demonstrating that about a third of people who take the shot are so sick they can't go to work the next day and there's probably some heart involvement there…but there are [also] clearly people who took the shot and and they don't sense anything is wrong with their heart and then the first manifestation of something wrong is a cardiac arrest and when the cardiac arrest occurs, let's say during sports. About a third of the time [in these cardiac arrest cases], patients can be saved with CPR and shocking the heart, but about two-thirds of the time, they can't be saved.
2.5% per shot, which I guess means a 5% chance for most of the population that vaxxed, and on top of that, another third of that population likely to have undetected, let us hope low-level, heart damage.
My God.
As for the “second” study, it is one by Nakahara and Narula, of 700 vaccinated v. 300 unvaccinated, and its results (11:50-13:00) are even more alarming. It was an examination of patients who had a PET scan for other reasons, but the imaging by its nature is capable of showing a certain indicator of heart damage, called FDG. And here are the horrid results:
And sure enough, the unvaccinated, the hearts looked clean, they looked fine.
The vaccinated patients, they were all taking up 18-FDG to some, you know, to some degree or another. …Again, those who had a sore arm had even more intensive uptake into the heart..
Emphasis added. I assume that “all” means 700 out of 700.
Also note Brennan’s quick mention (9:15) of mounting anecdotal evidence in his New Zealand that hospital admissions are way, way up—that’s as of late ‘23, and notice that it parallels what Nurse Dee anecdotally reports above about the current rate of Code Blues in American hospitals.
And I like McCullough’s statement at around 14:00 that quite a few of the doctors and health administrators know the data is getting worse and worse, and are currently
…in this fear-driven state where they're waiting for somebody of a higher level in the chain of command to finally tell them to drop the vaccines.
The cowardly traitors.
And obviously, the degree of treason-to-one’s-fellow-citizens increases the higher up you go on the chain.
The key take-away here is that in the cardiovascular area alone, the news is getting very bad. Cc. McCullough’s discussions in mid-2023 of the Thai myocarditis study and a European journal’s info on the teenager deaths—follow the links in footnote 16. I am very sorry for those of you reading this who vaxxed, as that comparison will show you that this video likely corrects, and in bad way, what McCullough said in his most essential video to date, his spring ‘23 testimony before the PA state senate, where he said he thought that majorities of the vaccinated got a dud or near-dud version of the jab. That cannot be correct if these Nakahara and Narula results stand.
This interview is rather too firehose-like, as McCullough doesn’t take as much time as I’d like for indicating the areas of uncertainty about these studies’ results, and as I’ve just suggested, he doesn’t at all go into how they likely require revision of previous conclusions of his. However, if you are among the vaxxed, notice he does indicate which treatments may be capable of removing the spike protein. Further, looking into other resources mentioned by McCullough here and at his substack may lead you to the type of tests you might try to see if your heart has suffered some of the damage these studies suggest it may have. I wish you the best, and admonish myself to pray, pray, pray.
Jessica Rose’s Presentation to the Croatian Parliament, Primarily on Residual DNA Contamination
The biggest bit of dissident news over the last five-to-six months has been the opening of another issue, that of residual DNA contamination. Think of it as the discovery of yet another “blade” in the “Swiss-Army knife” that is the CV-19 vax. You could go to the shocking testimony of Dr Phillip Buckhaults at the SC Senate from four or so months ago to see how they story “broke,” but this more recent presentation from one of the most important of the dissident scientists, Dr. Jessica Rose, to the Croatian Parliament is the best video on this, since she updates the info Buckhaults publicized, and ties it to other areas of concern regarding genetic integration or malfunction.
The big event was the discovery of DNA fragments, DNA that shouldn’t even be there, in most batches of the vaxxes, a result then confirmed by 4 different labs. It seems this DNA was used to manufacture the modified mRNA of the vaxxes, with an expectation that it would be removed by another process, but due to criminal levels of bad quality control, and yet again to agency malfeasance—she shows that some agencies knew the failure of the process to remove the residual DNA was happening—fragments of the original DNA remained in the concoction.
From about 9:00-14ish, you get Rose’s explanation of what probably happened, the clearest I know of.
BTW, this is one of Rose’s posts only available on her Unconditional Jessica stack.
Rose is careful to insist that we do not yet know if these DNA fragments being present in so many of the vaxxes have led to integration events (i.e., alteration of human cell DNA events), if that can give you much comfort.
On the no-comfort-possible side of the ledger, I would note that a) this is only one of several DNA-connected or flawed mRNA issues Rose raises in this video, and in others of her posts (look for delightful phrases like “LPS Contamination,” “SV-40,” and “Frameshifting”) and that b) this is yet another way in which the hopeful possibility Dr. McCullough latched onto in his PA senate testimony—that those who suffered no immediate arm-pain or soon-after harms received near-duds—might be revealed to be wrong.
Let me explain, as well as I can. For the myriads of kinds of CV-19 vax-harms, we only know, so far, of three main agents which cause them: the spike proteins, the lipid nanoparticles, and the grab-bag of related agents or events I’ll call the DNA/RNA bag. We know that many specific harms trace directly, and apparently primarily, to the first agent, have sketchier but still solid knowledge regarding ones caused by the second, as well as plausible theories about a number of harm-dynamics involving a combined working of these first two agents. But about the DNA/RNA “bag,” in many ways the most frightening of the three agents because by some accounts it could lead to permanent alteration of the human species, we don’t know much. There is no proven case of a new-DNA integration event in a human due to the vaxxes, either by the newly-revealed path of contaminant DNA, or by the reverse-transcription possibility with the modified mRNA, which is still not a ruled-out one, regardless of what the agencies say—see the first few minutes of Rose above. And there are other possibilities yet.
We see that cancers are way up, and that they are behaving weirdly, but my understanding is that their increase could be due to immunological damage instigated by the spike proteins. But of course, they could be primarily the result of the DNA/RNA bag of issues, and thus possibly, are like small columns of distant smoke seen shortly before a Lahaina-like fire sweeps across a town.
Thus also, if the vaxxes prove dangerous because of agents b) or c), then even if the spike protein was never produced in a recipients’ body, due to their having received a “dud” or a spoiled-via-bad-storage batch, they could still be in serious danger. I hope this speculation is misguided, that is, I hope that the conditions or failures which dudded-out the production of spike simultaneously would have had to have dudded-out agents b) and c). Otherwise, the partial comfort of the dud-batches possibility evaporates, and even if the Nakahara and Narula results about the cardiovascular harms, results already problematic for it (see above), prove wrong.
(And alas, it would also indicate that even if the vaxxed person finds treatments that cleanse her of spike, she’s got other possibilities for harm coming eventually.)
I’m well beyond my pay-grade now—these last four paragraphs are my own speculations which I do not have high confidence in—so I’ll stop, the better to give you the time you need with these crucial videos.
But as I can’t be your go-to digest, your real task, dear reader, is to keep up with: 1) pieces on the Brownstone Institute site, I’d say 50% of them, 2) podcasts/videos: John Campbell, Darkhorse Podcast, and guest-appearances here and there by Peter McCullough, Edward Dowd, Michael Yeadon, and Ryan Cole, 3) and of the substacks: Steve Kirsch, Igor Chudov, Eugyppius, Jessica Rose, Peter McCullough, Vigilant Fox, Transcriber B, Bill Rice, Jr., Aaron Kheriaty, Naomi Wolf, Midwestern Doctor, Mark Crispin Miller, Chris Bray, Sasha Latypova, William Makis, Margaret Anna Alice, Pierre Kory, and Robert Malone. I’d also recommend checking in now and then on dissidents more receptive to the wilder conspiratorial explanations, such as Jane Ruby on Rumble, and Paul Alexander on substack. Of all this, I’m only able to attend to 5%-10% of it on a good week, and the problem with existing Covid/Vax Disaster news-digests, such as Naked Emperor’s, is that they’re not selective enough. The closest we have is to a workable digest is the newer “Media Blackout” segments being jointly done by Maria Zee and Vigilant Fox, though these are only 20-30% disaster-related: I don’t listen to the whole videos of those, but the link-providing lists of the ten stories are helpful.
Kirsch, I guess to be on the safe side, oddly lists her as saying her estimate was around 90%, and consults another expert on the subject, Dr. Marik, who does say 90%.
It’s crazy how all the horrible news regarding the whole covid debacle is the worst thing that ever happened, and yet somehow it just keeps getting worse.
Anyways, great compilation! I agree that Dr. Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carlson’s interview doesn’t have a lot of ‘new’ info (for those of us who have been here on Substack for a while) but- I do agree with Jessica Rose of it’s bombshell importance due to the fact that Tucker Carlson has such a broad viewership. The other news pieces are most likely preaching to the choir.