This is a summary of the main points made by my recent 8,000+ word essay, “On Boosters and Child-Vaccination.”
1.) In the initial sections, I lay out a.) why we are likely in the last stage of the Covid-crisis, and b.) why political rancor and informational confusion will both increase during it.
2.) I also declare my main intention: to convince persons who have been vaccinated, but who have not yet pulled the trigger on getting boosted, or on vaccinating their children, to stop and consider what I call “dissident data,” which particularly is data about:
a.) adverse-reactions to the vaccines that have happened—i.e., short term ones.
b.) adverse-reactions to the vaccines which might develop over the long-term.
Overall, the essay argues that newer data on a.) and b.) should convince you (in most cases) not to boost and (in all cases) not to vax your kids.
3.) I provide a section on why Omicron likely means the end of the pandemic. Largely common-sense, but expert-opinion is coming to this conclusion also.
4.) In the most political section, I establish that in terms of their main purpose of stopping transmission, the vaxxes did not work. While I do not go into my entire, PhD.-in-political-science-based, case that the lockdowns of 2020-forward tended to harm the operation of democracy, and that the mandates/passports and other coercive-measures of mid-2021-forward were nothing less than a brazen betrayal of liberal-democratic principles, my pointed judgment on these purely-political damages of bad Covid-policy nonetheless comes through.
5.) I weigh the possible plusses and many minuses of vaccinating children. I show that by any comparative-risk calculation about short-term harms, the odds for each child are better if they don’t vax; I also show that vaxxing deprives many of them of a superior, likely life-long, immunity that they already have or likely would soon get if left unvaxxed. Later in the piece, after having illustrated that there is growing evidence that long-term harm is possible, I underline how devastating it would be for all concerned if you presumed to make such a choice for your children, and were later shown to have made it incorrectly.
6.) My longest section concerns boosting. After having made the usual disclaimer about how persons in vulnerable categories must engage in personalized risk-analysis, I marshal five reasons against boosting:
a.) Omicron eliminates the need for it (for most).
b.) You take on an adverse-reaction risk with each shot.
c.) The number of adverse-reaction events is quite shocking, and most persons are unaware of how large the real numbers likely are. I point to data emerging across the world of unexplained increases of all-cause mortality, and to a special-autopsy study that destroys the “coincidence” argument; I also review a couple of the key pro-vax counter-arguments on this, and do leave one of them, the “lack of aspiration” explanation, standing as a possible explanation of some of the adverse events.
d.) I argue that we do not yet have a scientific explanation for both the vast numbers, and the many various types, of adverse reactions, that can provide us with adequate assurance.
e.) I highlight the drug companies’ doing next-to-nothing to better-inform the public, which could be done with new investigations, full-disclosure of ingredients, and public debates.
7.) The most shocking section is the one which asks whether the vaxxes might do enough long-term damage to be thought of as poison-like. I stress that we do not know, and that it is a topic that must be discussed with greatest sensitivity, but I do provide links to a number of disturbing theories, and to findings that seem to partly vindicate them, theories which suggest that many of the vaxxed will face serious harms that develop more gradually.
a.) The most shocking finding, which I half-expect and dearly-hope will be proven to be an elaborate hoax, is a recent report from an embalmer, that he and many other embalmers have begun to find string-like clots in the veins of many of the cadavers they treat, and that this is an entirely new phenomenon. If it is not a hoax, I believe the implications are so disturbing that they will require an immediate ban of the vaxxes, and could send our societies into an entirely new sort of health-crisis.
Here are the promised links—share widely, please, as these really do contain life-and-death info:
I. Omicron taking over—Dr. John Campbell.
II. Higher-than-acceptable risks for kids—Timothy Ellison.
III. Sweden’s decision against recommending the vaxxing of children.
IV. Adverse-reaction deaths many more than we think—Steve Kirsch.
V. General review of what we know on adverse-reactions—Steve Kirsch again.
VI. Report on special autopsies that combats the “coincidence” argument—Dr. Burkhardt and Dr. Bhakdi.
VII. New Zealand’s unique data counters “Covid-did-it” explanation of adverse reactions—Peak Prosperity, at 12:00-15.
VIII. Concerns about ingredients--doctor’s panel.
IX. Pessimistic theorizing on auto-immune attacks over long-term—Dr. Bahkdi.
X. Another explanation of auto-immune attack possibility over long-term—Alex Berenson.
XI. Highlights of the recent Senate hearing, various content, much on withholding of early-treatment options—20 or so dissident doctors.
XII. Best general review of situation—December interview of P. McCullough by E. Weinstein.
XIII. Embalmer Richard Hirschman on the string-clots he and others are finding—interview by Dr. Ann Ruby.
So again, I’m begging you, if you’re considering either boosting or vaxxing children, look into this information before you pull the trigger.
I’ll leave you with a photo from Dr. Burkhardt’s special autopsy results: