Question: Why in the key abortion and right to privacy rulings does the majority find it necessary to defend themselves against the objection that the court is engaging in the substantive due process of Lochner v. NY (1905)?
Here are some examples of when that happens:
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) (not an abortion case, but the first right to privacy m…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to PostModernConservative to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.